Kanji Oshiro

★★★★★ Visibility is ok, but it has the necessary and sufficient specs such as lightness, scratch resistance, eco-drive and 200m water resistance.
Date posted : Sunday, Sep 1 2019


Translated by Google Visibility is ok, but it has the necessary and sufficient specs such as lightness, scratch resistance, eco-drive and 200m water resistance.
Anyway, I liked that it was light and not easily scratched.

Original Japanese review
視認性はまあまあですが、軽さ、耐傷加工、エコドライブ、200m防水と必要十分なスペックを有しています。
とにかく軽い、傷がつきにくいことが気に入りました。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Rui Akira

★★★★★ Is it a long time?
Date posted : Thursday, Jun 13 2019


Translated by Google Is it a long time?
Isn't it a long time as a Citizen Divers? The yellow dial is cool on the black dial. If you think about sapphire glass, titanium, GMT, it is excellent. A distinctive feature is the glass cyclops lens on the inside. This is unusual. There was a similar thing in the Royal Marine series that was released only in the past. Overall, the quality of the watch is high. The company called Citizen is pretty amazing. In particular, the quality of solar radio waves and titanium is higher than that of Seiko and Casio. It was early. As a personal impression, GMT is not necessary. The dial is messy and noisy. Citizen is too inclined to design. Divers are tools, so do n’t forget the decorations. I support Citizen's professional master, but the design is not good. This is a company where Citizen is a new and challenging culture, so it has both advantages and disadvantages. However, I think that Seiko's Prospex (Marine Master or Diver Scuba) and its own design tradition are very important. I think design is an asset. If you are Casio, you have evolved while valuing the square design DW-5000C. I've been doing full metal recently. I want citizens to cherish their past designs. Newness is also important. I feel that PMD56-2952 inherits the design language of Citizen's military watches when it is a professional master. I'd like divers too. Well, I've written some dissatisfaction, but this watch is a diver that Citizen put out, and it is a watch that seems to be cool and honest after a long time. Cospa is the best. If you like design, you can buy it. I think that it is a watch that can be used for a long time.

Original Japanese review
久々の当たりかなー？
シチズンのダイバーズとしては久々の当たり（マシ？）ではないでしょうか。ブラックの文字盤にイエローの差し色がカッコイイです。サファイアガラス、チタン、GMTとか考えたらコスパ抜群です。特徴的なのはガラスのサイクロップスレンズが内側に付いてること。これは珍しいですね。昔限定で出していたロイヤルマリーンシリーズで、同じようなのがありましたけど。総じて時計としてのクオリティは高いです。シチズンていう会社は結構すごいですよ。特にソーラー電波とチタンの品質はセイコーやカシオと比べても頭一つ出てます。取り組んだの早かったし。個人的感想としては、GMTはいらない。文字盤がごちゃごちゃしてうるさい。シチズンはデザインしたがる傾向が強すぎる。ダイバーズは道具なのだから装飾は排してほしい。シチズンのプロマスター応援してるんだけど、デザインがイマイチなんですよね。これはシチズンという企業が新しいことにチャレンジングな社風だから、メリット、デメリット両方あるんだけど。でも、セイコーのプロスペックス（マリーンマスターとかダイバースキューバとか）とか自社のデザインの伝統を結構大切にしてるじゃないですか。やっぱデザインって資産だと思うし。カシオだったらスクエアデザインのDW-5000Cを大切にしつつ、進化させてるじゃないですか。最近フルメタルとか出してるし。シチズンにも自社の過去のデザインを大切にしてほしいです。新しさも大切だけどね。プロマスターの中だとPMD56-2952はシチズンのミリタリーウォッチのデザイン言語を継承してる感じしますけど。ダイバーズでもお願いします。まあ、不満も書いてしまったんですが、この時計はシチズンが出したダイバーズで久々に素直にカッコイイと思える時計です。コスパ最高もいいです。デザイン気に入った人は買ってOKですよ。長く付き合える時計だと思います。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Makoto Takahashi

★★★★★ Presence, light, sapphire glass
Date posted : Monday, Jun 3 2019


Translated by Google Presence, light, sapphire glass
I am satisfied that I can purchase this watch for less than 50,000 yen. I have PMX56-2812, the company's professional master diver.

Original Japanese review
存在感あり、軽い、サファイアガラス
5万円未満でこの腕時計が購入できて満足です同社のプロマスターダイバー、PMX56-2812を所持していますが過去の製品を大幅に上回るクオリティだと思います

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---

Sakura Shiro

★★★★★ I was surprised that this price was cheap with titanium.
Date posted : Thursday, May 2 2019


Translated by Google I was surprised that this price was cheap with titanium.
It's usually big.

Original Japanese review
チタンでこの価格は安い驚きました。
普段ずかい。

Was this review helpful?
     Report

---