It is very easy to use and has a sense of quality. I think that it can be used in any scene with little time gap. There is no problem even if it is washed with water. However, the belt cannot be fine-tuned, so I was fine with the right size, but it would be a little tight if it did not fit.
Reviewer: Aki Hirota 
★★★★★ A texture that does not seem to be Poormans GS
Post date : 28/04/2019
Translated by Google
A texture that does not seem to be Poormans GSI used to use Omega and Hamilton mechanicals in the past, but I couldn't put up with the daylight, which is also a weak point of the mechanical type to use in the main, I replaced it with a BRIGHTZ radio watch and used it for a while After a long time, I wanted a mechanical type, and I was considering using a domestic mechanical type that does not require maintenance costs. When it comes to a domestically simple design and a reasonable texture, Seiko's GS or presage has been chosen, but when it comes to a mechanical type with GS, it is strict in terms of budget, and I thought of a quartz GS. After all, I couldn't give up on the smooth movement of mechanical needles, and I chose SARX035 because of the good cospa. When you actually arrive at it and look again, it is intentionally different that the needle is thinner than the GS or the accuracy of the movement is inferior, but the half price of the quartz of the actual sale GS It is recommended that you can buy it at a price that is less than 1/3 of the mechanical type and that the quality of this material is quite satisfactory.
Original Japanese review 
プアマンズGSとは思えない質感
過去にはオメガやハミルトンの機械式を使っていたこともありましたがメインで使うには機械式の弱点でもある日差にどうしても我慢できなくなり、ブライツの電波時計に買い替えてしばらく使っていましたが久しぶりに機械式も欲しくなり維持費の掛からない国産の機械式で検討していました。国産でシンプルなデザイン、そしてそれなりの質感となるとセイコ－のGSかプレサ－ジュの２択になりましたがGSで機械式となると予算的に厳しく、クウォ－ツのGSも考えたのですがやはり機械式の滑らかな針の動きが諦められず、結局コスパの良さもありSARX035を選択しました。実際に手元に届いて改めて見てみるとGSと比べれば針を細くしてあったり、ム－ブメントの精度が劣ったりと意図的に差をつけてありますが実売GSのクウォ－ツの半値、機械式の1/3以下の値段で買えるのとこの質感の高さを見ればかなり満足度が高いですのでオススメです。
Is this review helpful?
Report
Reviewer: Hiro Itabashi
★★★★★ It is not inferior to Grand Seiko.
Post date : 14/01/2019
Translated by Google
It is not inferior to Grand Seiko.If you simply compare cost performance, I think this is the winner. The accuracy of the movement is perfect, and the texture of the case and breath is also excellent. It would be unreasonable for overseas manufacturers to make such products at this price. Although it was owned by Rolex and Omega, it is definitely a wonderful product than Omega which is more than double the price. We purchased as clock to use for everyday work, but look forward to wearing every day from now on.
Original Japanese review
グランドセイコーに勝るとも劣らないです。
単純にコストパフォマンスで比較してしまえばこちらの勝ちだと思います。ムーブメントの精度も申し分ありませんしケース・ブレスの質感も素晴らしい出来栄えだと思います。この価格でこのような製品が作れるのは海外メーカーではムリでしょうね。ロレックス、オメガと所有しましたが倍以上値段がするオメガより断然素晴らしい製品ですね。普段仕事用に使用する時計として購入しましたがこれから毎日着用するのが楽しみです。
Is this review helpful?
Report
Reviewer: Gorou Tanaka
★★★★★ Jackpot
Post date : 5/01/2019
Translated by Google
Jackpot7 days after purchase, 6 seconds behind. It is a little less than 1 second in a day. Was 6R15 so accurate? The real thing is more beautiful than the photo. I am very satisfied. This quality is not a big deal even if the price is a quarter made in Switzerland.
Original Japanese review
大当たり
購入して７日目、６秒遅れ。１日で１秒弱の遅れ。６R１５ってこんなに精度良かったっけ？実物は写真より美しい。大満足です。この品質で値段はスイス製の四分の一と云っても大袈裟ではない。
Is this review helpful?
Report
